Face shape · one of 7

Oblong

Oblong is length with nothing else going on: forehead, cheekbones and jaw all measure about the same, the sides run close to parallel, and the face is at least 1.45 times as long as it is wide. Also published as Rectangle, which describes it better — the jaw can be soft or sharp and it is still this shape.

How to measure Take the free test

Also called Rectangle / Long. Same shape, different name — this page covers both.

How to check whether this is you

Four numbers, straight on, hair pushed back, camera at eye level rather than above. Forehead at its widest, temple to temple, roughly halfway between the brow and the hairline. Cheekbones at the widest point, level with the outer corner of the eye. Jaw at the angle, between the corners you can feel below and just forward of each earlobe. Length, from where the hairline starts down to the bottom of the chin. Oblong is decided almost entirely on that last number. Length divided by cheekbone width comes out at about 1.45 or above, which corresponds to the top band of the published anthropometric scale in Sources below. The three widths agree with one another within about seven percent, so drawn as an outline the sides are close to parallel from temple to jaw rather than curving in or out. Note what does not matter: the jaw corner. A sharp corner does not make this Square and a soft one does not make it Oval — at this length the shape is Oblong either way, and that is the single most useful thing on this page. Two mis-measurements dominate. First, measuring from the top of the head instead of the hairline, which adds two to four centimeters and turns ordinary faces into long ones; the measurement starts where hair currently grows, and if your hairline has receded you are measuring a hairline rather than a skull. Second, hair height. Take the photograph with the hair flat and pushed back, because a blow-dry with root lift is measured as face by anyone eyeballing it, yourself included.

Where it sits on the four axes

Face shape here is four measurements, not a vibe: proportion, jawline, top-to-bottom balance, and where the face is widest. Those are the four scores the questionnaire produces, so a verdict can always be traced back to the measurement that drove it.

ProportionStrongly: longer than wide · +3wider than longlonger than wide
JawlineSlightly: curved · -1curvedangular
Top-to-bottom balanceBalanced — neither pole dominates · 0forehead widerjaw wider
CheekbonesClearly: flat · -2flatwidest point

Why someone gets read as Oblong

Grouped by the axis each observation moves.

Proportion

Strongly: longer than wide · +3

Length over cheekbone width measures about 1.45 or more, which is the top band of the published anthropometric range rather than merely the long side of average.
In a straight-on photo the face reads as clearly elongated. Cropped tight to the hairline and chin, the frame is obviously taller than it is wide.

Jawline

Slightly: curved · -1

The jaw does not decide this shape. Tracing from chin to ear may give a soft curve or a real corner, and either is consistent with Oblong, because it is length rather than the jaw doing the work.
The chin is neither pointed nor conspicuously broad. It closes the face on roughly the same width as the jaw itself, which is part of why the outline reads as a rectangle.

Top-to-bottom balance

Balanced — neither pole dominates · 0

Forehead and jaw measure within about seven percent of each other. Neither end is the wide one, so the face has no direction of taper at all.
Drawn as an outline the sides run close to parallel from the temple down to the jaw, which is what separates this from every wedge-shaped face.

Cheekbones

Clearly: flat · -2

The cheekbones measure about the same as the forehead and the jaw rather than wider. Nothing bulges out at eye level and comes back in.
Cheekbones are subtle in a straight-on photo. On a face this long the eye tracks up and down rather than stopping at the mid-face, and there is no shadow line to stop it.

What suits it

Haircuts and partings: Take length away and put width in, and the fastest way to do both is a fringe. A blunt brow-skimming fringe cut straight across, or a heavy curtain fringe, physically shortens the visible face by covering the top third of it, and no other single change moves this shape as much. Then build width between the cheekbone and the jaw: a chin-length blunt bob, a lob with a bend through the ends, waves that start at the cheekbone, and layers that add bulk at the sides rather than at the crown. This is the one shape where a blunt bob ending at the jaw is the right answer rather than the wrong one, which is worth saying because the same cut is the standard warning on the Round page. What to avoid is everything vertical: long one-length hair with a center part and no volume, a high ponytail or top-knot, exaggerated root lift at the crown, and a very short cut with flat sides and height on top. If you wear it up, take a low bun with some width at the sides rather than a high one.
Glasses and sunglasses: Deep frames, decorated at the sides. Lens height is the measurement that matters here more than on any other shape: a tall lens covers more of the face vertically and shortens what is left, so an oversized square, a large round, or a wayfarer with real depth all beat a shallow narrow rectangle. A strong browline or a contrasting top bar draws a horizontal across the face and cuts the length. Decorative, thicker or contrast-colored temple arms pull the eye sideways, which is the direction you want it going. What to avoid: shallow half-rim rectangles, narrow oval frames, and rimless designs, all of which take structure off the face and leave the length uninterrupted. Frames sitting high on the nose also expose more chin, so a lower bridge fit is usually better.
Necklines and collars: Horizontals, high on the chest. A boat neck, a wide scoop, a turtleneck, a mock neck and a spread collar all shorten the visible run from chin to chest, and a turtleneck in particular is doing real work on this shape rather than merely being warm. Horizontal stripes at the neckline help for the same reason. What to skip is the deep V and the plunging surplice, which extend the vertical line straight down from a face that is already long. For necklaces, take a choker at 14 to 16 inches or a collar at 16 inches, or several short chains layered horizontally; a single long pendant on a 28 to 30 inch chain is the piece to leave in the drawer.
Earrings: Wide rather than long. Round hoops, large button studs, wide discs, clusters and any shape whose dimension runs side to side all add horizontal at ear level. Hoops of an inch and a half or more are genuinely useful here. What to avoid is the whole family of long drops: linear bars, threaders, shoulder-dusters and narrow chandeliers, each of which adds vertical exactly beside the part of the face you are trying to shorten. If you want a drop, take one that is short and wide — a wide teardrop hanging no lower than the earlobe — rather than a long narrow one.
Brow shape: Keep them flat to softly arched, full, and extending horizontally. A strong high arch adds vertical to a face that has plenty, so the peak should be low and gentle or absent altogether; a straight brow is one of the few places where a horizontal line genuinely helps rather than hurts, which is the opposite of the advice on the Square page. Let the tail run its full length rather than tapering it short, since the width of the brow line reads as width of the face. Keep some thickness. A thin, high, sharply arched brow is the shape to avoid here.
Contour, blush and highlight: Shorten from the ends. Take a matte shade one to two tones deeper than your skin and lay it along the top of the forehead at the hairline, blending downward, and along the bottom edge of the jaw and under the chin, blending upward. Those two bands do more than anything else on this face, and they are the two places most contour tutorials skip. Leave the sides of the face alone. Blush goes on horizontally, swept across the cheek from the apple out toward the temple on a level line rather than angled upward, which draws a band across the middle of the face. Highlight across the tops of the cheekbones in the same horizontal direction, and skip the long stripe down the bridge of the nose, which is the single most lengthening thing in a standard routine.

Easy to confuse with

Oblong vs Square

Same outline, different length, and this is the most common wrong answer on both pages. Square runs about 1.20 to 1.30 on length over cheekbone width; Oblong runs about 1.45 and up. A square jaw does not settle it, since an Oblong face can have exactly the same corner. Measure the length from the hairline rather than the top of the head before you decide.

Read the Square page →

Oblong vs Oval

Both are longer than wide with a soft jaw, so the question is how much longer and whether the sides curve. Oval sits at about 1.30 to 1.42 with the cheekbones the widest measurement and a gentle taper toward the chin; Oblong sits at 1.45 and up with all three widths within about seven percent and near-parallel sides. Trace your outline and look for a curve.

Read the Oval page →

Oblong vs Diamond

Both are long. The difference is the middle: a Diamond bulges at the cheekbone, beating the forehead and jaw by ten percent or more, and pinches in above and below it. An Oblong does not bulge anywhere. If you press below the outer corner of your eye and feel a ridge standing proud of the surface, read the Diamond page instead.

Read the Diamond page →

Oblong vs Triangle

A long face with a heavy jaw can look like either. Divide the jaw width by the forehead width: on a Triangle the answer is about 1.15 or more and the face visibly widens on the way down, on an Oblong it is close to 1.00 and the sides stay parallel. Length alone does not decide it, so take both width measurements rather than only the one that stands out.

Read the Triangle page →

Oblong is one of four readings

Face shape decides frames and haircuts. The dossier reads it against your color season, your body line and your skin undertone — which is what decides an outfit — and shows the evidence table behind all four.

Get the dossier — $19One time · 14-day refund

Sources

— 5 claims, each with where it comes from

Every claim on this page that is not our own measurement is listed here with where it comes from. Anything we could not source, we left out.

The threshold used here, a length-over-width ratio of about 1.45 and above, corresponds to the top band of a published anthropometric scale rather than to a styling rule of thumb.Shrestha R, Shrestha N, Upadhyay HP, "Prevalence of Leptoprosopic Type of Face among Dental Students: A Cross-Sectional study", JNMA Journal of the Nepal Medical Association 2019; 57(218):216-220, doi:10.31729/jnma.4416. Read in full on 2026-08-31. It defines the facial index as nasion-to-gnathion height over bizygomatic width, times 100, and gives leptoprosopic as 90 to 94.5 and hyperleptoprosopic, the very long face, as 95 to 99.5. The anthropometric height starts at the nasion, at the bridge of the nose, not at the hairline; converting to the hairline-to-chin measurement on this page is our own arithmetic, multiplying by 1.5 on the classical three-part division of the face, which puts hyperleptoprosopic at roughly 1.43 and up. This page rounds that to 1.45 as its cut point, so the threshold is ours and the band behind it is theirs. Other published tables set the boundaries a point or two differently.
The widely repeated claim that an oval face is about one and a half times as long as it is wide is why so many people land on this page in error.Read on 2026-08-31 at faceshapedetector.app, the highest-traffic face shape tool in this market. Its face shapes page says of Oval that "The face length is roughly one and a half times the width, with a gently rounded jawline" and gives "~1.5:1 (L:W)" in its comparison table, while describing Oblong only as "Face length is significantly greater than width". The page attributes its figures to its own scan volume and cites no external study. On the conversion in the source above, 1.5 is already past the top of the published human range, so a reader who measures 1.35 against a stated oval target of 1.5 will conclude they are short rather than long — and a reader who measures 1.5 will believe they are merely oval.
The reason a fringe, a turtleneck and a wide hoop change how long the face looks is a documented perceptual bias, not a figure of speech.Blanusa J, Zdravkovic S, "Horizontal-vertical illusion in mental imagery: quantitative evidence", Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2015;9:33, doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00033, read on 2026-08-31. The paper studies the illusion in which, as it puts it, "those two equal lines appear to have different length due to their orientation", with the vertical extent judged the longer of the two. We cite it for the direction of the effect only. Applying a result about two drawn lines to haircuts, necklines and earrings is our inference and not a finding of that study, and we did not find a study testing the styling advice itself.
Oblong is one of the categories that vanishes when a source uses a shorter list, so another tool may call this face something else.Read on 2026-08-31. Optometrists.org, published by Optometrists Network, names five shapes in its frame guide — square, round, heart, triangular and oval — and does not treat oblong or rectangle as a separate category. The labelled dataset at github.com/dsmlr/faceshape, published with Pasupa K, Sunhem W, Loo CK, "A Hybrid Approach to Building Face Shape Classifier for Hairstyle Recommender System", Expert Systems With Applications, doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.11.011, does carry an oblong class among its five directories, so the two five-item lists are not even the same five.
Seven face shapes is the count taught in the standard United States cosmetology curriculum, so a stylist will recognize this category by name.Milady Standard Cosmetology, 14th Edition, 13th-14th Edition Transition Guide (Milady, a part of Cengage Learning, copyright 2023; document 79011_TransitionGuide_rev01, dated 24 March 2022), read in full on 2026-08-31. Chapter 9, Principles of Hair Design, learning objective 7 reads "Identify the seven different facial shapes and design a beneficial hairstyle for each", and the guide lists a new "Table 9-4, Determining Face Shapes". It does not enumerate the seven names, so we do not claim our seven are word-for-word Milady's.